Wolves Gone Wild

Durango wolf pack that had been harassing families and homes, has been lost by the government. A child even had to pack a gun to be in her yard due to these wolves.

The Mr. Parsons has made lots of money off the tax payer funded mongrel wolf program and he does not care that this wolf pack and the males previous mate had bit a person and was constantly harassing a family. Parsons wants large predator out in our area and dispersing to your area, he does not care if their is no natural or native prey for these predators.

Fish and Wildlife Service has also stated in meetings that all the mongrel Mexican Wolves we have hanging around our homes have genetic duplicates currently being cage raised to release elsewhere so the argument about important genetics even with the knowledge this man has of suspect dog breeding is nothing short of scandalous, misinformation and junk science.

There is even video of these wolves in another families front yard. These wolves were well known for causing trouble in the first time they were released before being picked up at tax payer expense and placed in wolfie dog spa for a year to roll the strikes off their record.

This biased reporter Rene Romo has also written very slanted articles in the past including leaving out information that children have been studied here and are having serious psychological issues due to the constant harassment by these wolves. Of course where was wolf lover Rene Romo or the Albuquerque Journal when the wolves were at the family’s home 28 times in 30 days. He could have gotten some great video like the family did. Any editor should be ashamed to miss such an news worthy event.

Then again how could the press keep the wolf wars going if they did not mislead and misrepresent the information. I guess it is better to slant the news and keep pandering to the environmental extreme then show people what the wolves are really doing.

Wolves Missing In Gila Forest By Rene Romo

LAS CRUCES— The suspicious disappearance of the three-member Durango wolf pack is the latest blow to the endangered Mexican gray wolf recovery program in southwestern New Mexico.

The pack, including two adults outfitted with radio collars that continue to transmit even if the wolf is dead, hasn’t been detected since early this month.
“We couldn’t find them,” said Elizabeth Slown, spokeswoman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. “Now their fate is considered unknown. … It’s perplexing. You could see one collar malfunctioning, but this would have to be two collars malfunctioning.”
Advocates of the program say it is suspicious for several wolves to suddenly go undetected after weeks of searches.
The Catron County commission on Nov. 7 warned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that it planned to trap the Durango pack’s alpha male, known as AM973, which the county considered a “dangerous wolf” because it had repeatedly gone near a home on the Adobe Ranch in northern Catron County.
“I would say it (the pack’s disappearance) is both worrisome and unusual,” said Dave Parsons, a conservation biologist with the Albuquerque-based Rewilding Institute and the former Fish and Wildlife Service coordinator for the program.
Laura Schneberger, president of the Gila Livestock Growers Association, agreed the disappearance is suspicious but added, “None of us had anything to do with it.”
The association has been critical of the wolf reintroduction because of repeated livestock kills and concerns about human safety.
“Of course it’s suspicious,” Schneberger said. “That’s what happens when you have a bunch of wolves running around people’s houses and camps. They are going to get killed, because people can’t put up with them. … Is anyone surprised that the Durango pack has gone missing after they were allowed to become so habituated?”
The pack, including an adult male and female and an uncollared pup, was last seen Nov. 1 near the ranch house in the northeast section of the Gila National Forest.
The recovery program has tried to track the wolves in aerial and ground searches.

Read the Rest of the Story but not the full, accurate or real story by any stretch of the imagination

Release the Mongrel Mexican Gray Wolves

In a recent article by… the author suggests shipping some Alaskan wolves to California to help reduce the beaver problem in Martinez California.

Martinez, Calif., has a wildlife problem: Too many beavers, and nobody wants them killed. Well, almost nobody.
Alaska has a wildlife problem: Too many wolves, and nobody wants them killed. Well, almost nobody.
Is it possible these two problems could be brought together in one easy, perfectly natural solution?
Wolves love beavers.

OK, they don’t actually “love'’ beavers; they love to eat beavers.
And that could be a good thing in this case. Think of it as the perfectly natural way to deal with what the San Francisco Chronicle headlined as the “fate of popular beavers and their damned dam.'’
Bringing the wolves and the beavers together certainly has to beat the alternatives.

“The beaver dam, built right on a recently completed flood improvement project, has grown from three to six feet in height since last winter, putting the town in serious jeopardy of being inundated during winter rains,'’ the Chronicle’s Peter Fimrite reported earlier this month.

For a city to end up flooded by its own flood improvement project would not only be costly, it would be embarrassing. So Martinez has resolved something needs to be done.

“The (city) staff report, made public Friday, says the city should remove the dam and ‘humanely depredate the beavers,’ ‘’ Fimrite wrote. (read the full story)

I must praise this author for not only thinking environmentally but thinking about what is best for California. I grant Craig Medred my Wolf Award for excellence.

The author is right, after all after culling the beavers to only the strong (or that whole population of beavers as happened to snowshoe hair on Ellesmere Island) the wolves will set out on other prey no doubt culling a few radical environmentalists from the human herd. But no doubt the wolves will improve the breed of beavers so only the best live.

This author is on to a great idea that all the Californians that support the wolf program and dysfunctional hybrid Mexican gray wolf program with their donations, get to have a few wolves in their yards too. I think New Mexicans can improve on the Alaskan solution.

Your Alaskan wolves are not ready for the urban environment like our habituated Mexican gray wolves. Why because our half breed cage raised Mexican Mongrel Gray Wolves are much tamer and already have been hanging around human communites into an art form. They are even up on some of their shots…well not rabies but who is counting (those vaccines are bad right?).

So often the Mexican gray wolves even visit our yards leaving our dead and maimed pets or other little presents in our yards. I have heard at the Academy Awards the celebrities love getting gifts. So I am sure they would enjoy the presents that the mongrel Mexican Gray Wolves would leave them.

California celebrities would also be glad to hear about our new thinner elk and how they got there with a type of wasp waist. Might even be the new diet craze called Chronic Wasting Disease which is present now in our elk herds (spred by wolves and other predators) but those poking out hip bones look really sexy.

The habituated Mexican Gray Wolf will no doubt settle into the Martinez and other urban communities of Contra Costa County like they have here in our counties in New Mexico. These wolves are constantly around our homes so no doubt they will be much happier in an urban environment than the northern wolf.

These hybrid wolves also know how to den near homes so California kids will be able to share in the joys of watching the pups grown and slaughter their pets and livestock as is common here in New Mexico. No need to watch the biased wolf documentaries on National Geographic. Reduction of TV time for children another great benefit to these wolves.

Our wolves here are already well acquainted to the use of gunfire, rubber bullets and other hazing techniques so California will no doubt be a safe haven for them. Heck they can just hang out with the gang bangers and do a little tagging like they already do around our homes here. (I could link up the pictures of wolf poop on our porches but I will spare you)

Our wolves here are so tame they are even stalking (oops I mean following) school children home from school. While our Governor (and presidential candidate) Bill Richardson thinks it is wonderful and throws is support to wolf awareness week, I cannot wait to see what they will do in California. Maybe they will create a wolf holiday for the stalking wolf or change their state flag to the wolf.

Here the wolves also have not faired so well having to cross 100s of miles to find communities to use in gathering their food. In California with a much denser population, the mongrel Mexican Gray wolves should have an easier time in finding pets and other food to eat.

I am sure unlike people in New Mexico that understand fully that wolves stalking and encircling children is a prey testing for future attacks, in California they will think the wolves were just curious and wanted to be taken home and cuddled (the wolves were just misunderstood).

One family here has had a pack constantly eating their pets and livestock and has visited them over 27 times in 30 days. No doubt in California they will be charging admission. Then instead of Defenders of Wildlife posters of wolves looking cute on their walls they can see real wolves in action killing their pets. Then we can blame them for letting their pet out for a few seconds to go pee outside instead of on their livingroom rug. Here in New Mexico the blame game is all to popular by goverment officals.

Of course what would California be without lawyer suing when the wolves get aggressive and do what wolves historically do and environmental groups suing to protect the wolves, along with someone else suing to protect the beaver’s property rights to their dam.

With the expansion of the Wolf reintroduction boundaries of the Mexican Gray Wolf program…wolves will soon disperse to California so it is only a matter of time. Lets help them out and send them a few wolves now. I mean no disrespect but I am also not sure your Alaskan wolves can match the spiked up genetics of our Mexican gray wolves.

Donations for private plane transportation now being accepted. After all you cannot expect these expensive ($300,000+ tax dollers per wolf) wolves to fly coach. They must fly Al Gore style.

Finally a reporter gets it right.  With the recent campaign from environmental extreme groups have started running extremely misleading ads on the management of the wolf program.  These ads are just tugging at your heart strings with cuties Disneyesque pictures to make you feel bad that any of them might be shot.  No doubt the environmental extreme is also looking to pad their bank accounts and payrolls by end of year with your well intended donations.

This reporter, unlike other members of the aphetic press that have lost their logic and researching abilities, examines the ad campaign about the killing of excess wolves to determine what is truth and what is a misrepresentation of the facts.

Environmental Groups Don’t Want Gray Wolves Killed
CBS4 Gives Ad Campaign A Reality Check
(CBS4) DENVER There’s a new political ad from an environmental group that depicts helicopter gunners hunting down wolf puppies. It packs an emotional punch and is bound to get your attention.

Ad Begins

“If the Bush administration has its way, nearly 600 wolves could be gunned down in the northern Rockies.”

THIS IS TRUE

The claim is technically true, but it’s also misleading. It comes from the Natural Resources Defense Council and it opposes a plan by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to make it easier for states like Idaho, Montana and Wyoming to cull their wolf populations. The group also opposes a move to take the gray wolf off of the endangered species list in the northern Rockies.

Sources:

NRDC Action Fund: Bush Administration Takes Aim at Wolves

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mountain-Prairie Region Endangered Species Programming the Northern Rocky Mountain Population (NRM) of Gray Wolf as a Distinct Population Segment and Removing this Distinct Population Segment from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

Gray Wolf

Gray Wolf Biology Questions and Answers

There is of course more to the story. When the federal government re-introduced wolves back in 1995, 1996 the goal was to build a stable population of at least 300 animals, and that mission has been accomplished. In fact, it’s gone so well, there’s now more than 1,200 gray wolves in the northern Rockies. Consequently Idaho, Wyoming and Montana want the federal government to back off, and the states want to manage their own wolf populations. The states say they need to cull wolves when they attack livestock or over-hunt the elk herds in certain areas.

How would the states do that? By shooting, trapping or issuing hunting permits.

So here’s the spin. The shrill sound of the ad ignores the fact that the states are required to preserve a sustainable wolf population. Meaning they’re here for good. The minimum requirements must preserve at least 100 wolves (10 breeding pairs) per state, but are likely to be managed at a higher level because the states’ fear falling below the threshold would invite federal oversight.

The ad also fails to mention that wolves inside the national parks like Yellowstone and Glacier remain fully protected.

Ad Continues:

“You can help stop the massacre. Go to www.stoptheguns.org”

THE BOTTOM LINE

The bottom line is environmental groups believe the eco-system in the northern Rockies would benefit from more wolves, not less.

There’s lots of evidence to show wolves make for healthier game herds and support a number of diverse species, but states say they have a right to manage their wildlife problems as they see fit, and for now the federal government seems inclined to agree.

Orginal Story

What the environmental extreme does not want you to see if the videos we have of Mexican Gray Mongrel Wolves constantly in our yards.

by Valerius Geist, PhD, P. Biol.

Posted from WolfCrossing.org

I am one of two scientists asked by Kenton Carnegie’s parents to investigate the matter of his death. My reports were submitted to the coroner as well as both parties to the case and are available to you upon request.

The jury at the coroner’s inquest has found that wolves killed Kenton Carnegie. It is gratifying that science and not politics carried the day. However, when the coroner decided to limit the number of expert witnesses that could testify on behalf of the Carnegies’ to one, and chose Mark McNay and his excellent report (to which I hope you have access), he also signaled that the inquest would stay away from policy issues. That is, the corner’s inquest would focus on the narrow question who killed Kenton Carnegie, to which the answer is “a wolf pack”.

The answer to the question what killed Kenton Carnegie is “the belief that wolves are not dangerous to humans”. Consequently, neither the jury nor the public were made aware of the fact that this belief has killed three persons in the recent past, and that it has a very long and most unsavory political history. Thus the attempt to whitewash wolves in the Kenton Carnegie tragedy by blaming bears is but one instance in a very long history of misrepresenting wolves. Moreover, this misrepresentation is not only historical, but ongoing, and involves scientists - so called and genuine - as well a agencies, governments, environmental organizations and in the past political parties. The recommendations of the jury, predictably, fall short of addressing matters of broader public concern. Please allow me to illustrate:

The Kenton Carnegie tragedy would very likely not have taken place in British Columbia because that province has in place laws that quickly eliminate habituating garbage wolves as well as wolves aggressive to humans - and Saskatchewan does not. The only exception is where wolves are protected de facto or de jure. I soon found out that this was a very touchy subject in Saskatchewan. So, shall we discuss this issue in detail or not?

The juries recommendation that garbage dumps be fenced is well meaning but innocent. Fences are ripped apart, dug under, climbed over by bears and wolves, while fallen trees and snowdrifts make fences useless. The pitfalls of fences have been minutely covered in debates and court cases about game ranching. Wolves are not only superlative escape artists but also break-in artists! Should the public not know?

Nobody in Saskatchewan had the expertise or had done the scholarly homework that showed that both, wolves and urban dwelling coyotes, target human victims in an identical manner. This is but one instance of scholarly and professional shortcoming. There are plenty more! Are scientists and professionals not accountable for their statements?

Moreover, such knowledge is absolutely essential in forewarning travelers or residents in wilderness areas about impending wolf confrontations or attacks. Is such of no interest to the public?

The public is being overwhelmed by statements that wolves are harmless, misunderstood creatures, not dangerous to humans. Such a message has come not only from North Americans and Europeans, from environmentalist and Russia’s communist party, from respectable scientists and romantic literati, while evidence to the contrary has been systematically suppressed, censored, belittled and misrepresented. It’s a sordid history, some of which is a systematic hoodwinking of the public. Is the public not entitled to know?

Wolves are virtually harmless under some conditions and exceedingly dangerous in others. Is the public not entitled to know?

The above is but a sample of the concerns not covered.

Valerius Geist, PhD, P. Biol.
Professor Emeritus of Environmental Science
The University of Calgary

The self professed wolf expert, Dr. Paul Paquet, that strung this court along and the Carnegie family along with is incorrect “expert”.  This important public safety information has been delayed for over 2 years due to his lies in trying to rewrite what the evidence and eye witnesses clearly saw.   This was not only a miscarriage of justice to the family but put public safety at risk.

I recommend that all data, science and studies reviewed or authored by Dr. Paul Paquet shall be removed from the records of the wolf program and all his information shall be researched again by an independent source.  If this man cannot properly identify a bear or wolf track or even clearly review a mountain of evidence pointing to wolves, what other misinformation has he perpetuated on the current wolf science?