Favorite Stories




Latest Comments




Latest Posts


Archive for the 'Management Gone Wild' Category

Wolf Recovery Program Meetings Conclude and Exclude the Truth

Posted in Wolf Politics, Most Popular, Management Gone Wild, Wolf Award on December 16th, 2007 by Wild

Fish and Wildlife Services continues their one sided management where they will not allow the Catron County Wolf Investigator into a meeting but they do let Defenders of Wildlife in to put out their information.    These tax payer funded salaried employees did not want the truth and the picture display of all the pets, horses and other live stock killed by these wolves being shown to the people that will soon be having newly bred, cage raised and habituated wolves in their yards.  They are working only to protect their jobs.  Because if the new people soon to be affected knew the truth the program would be ended. 

Wolves have constantly been showing up in peoples yards allover and yet little or nothing has been done.  They want the new communities affected to think they are doing something and following the rules when they pick up an uncollared wolf and then just toss it back out into the community to eat their horses, cattle, pets and even endanger your children.  These monkey managers will then show up and say oh you should not live here.

The Silver City Daily Press did a great job bringing out the truth and exclusive methods that US Fish and Wildlife Service is using on the Wolf Program.
Wolf Recovery Program Meetings Conclude

Silver City Daily Press - Orginal Story 

Scoping meetings on the Mexican Gray Wolf Recovery Program have been concluded, but written com­ments may be submitted through Dec. 31.
At a recent meeting in Glenwood, Catron County wolf investigator Jess Carey was denied entrance with a display of pets and animals torn apart and eaten by wolves, according to Catron County Manager Bill Aymar.
“He probably could have gone in, but they wouldn’t let him bring the display,’ Aymar said. “It’s about 10 to 15 feet long, has photos and data about wolf depredations.’
Aymar said he thinks the meetings “aren’t about getting unbiased infor­mation.’
“It’s not about a dialogue; it’s checking off the boxes that meet­ings were held and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife will go ahead with what it planned in the first place,’ Aymar said. “There are wolves out there that we have no problem with. They stay away from humans. A sighting should be special, not something that you have to go to a rancher’s cattle pen to see.’
Calls to John Slown of the Wolf Recovery Program have not been returned.
Comments on the program may be sent to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, addressed to John Slown, New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, 2105 Osuna NE, Albuquerque, NM 87113.
Written comments may also be faxed to (505) 346-2542 or e-mailed to R2FWE_AL@fws.gov.
One’s name and address must be included with each comment.
The information that was presented at the scoping meetings may be viewed at www.mexicanwolfeis.org.> Questions regarding the scoping process or development of a proposed rule amending the 1998 10(j) Final Rule should be directed to Slown at (505) 761-4782, according to the Wolf Recovery Program Web site.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

Wolf Stalks Kids at School Play Yard

Posted in Wolf Warnings, Wolf Politics, EnvironMental, Most Popular, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Management Gone Wild, Property Rights on December 2nd, 2007 by Wild

School on lockdown due to wolf stalking children

Friday, November 30, 2007 children at the Glenwood school in New Mexico had a wolf stalking children at their play ground.  The uncollared wolf appeared and was about 17 yards from the playground.  The school was quickly locked down.

The county wolf investigator was called out to cast tracks and look for other wolf evidence.

In 2005 the school in Blue Arizona was also stalked by the Aspen wolves who were later relocated to New Mexico and have been involved in various attacks and kills including slaughtering a little girls horse.

Is this what the wolf lovers were looking for when they support wolf recovery?

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

Habituated Mexican Grey Wolves Threaten Hikers and Hunters - Luna Wolf pack at it again

Posted in Wolf Warnings, Wolf Politics, Most Popular, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Ecology, Animal Stories, Management Gone Wild on November 30th, 2007 by Wild

Another posting from WolfCrossing.org showing how dangerious these habituated Mexican gray wolves are.  The environMental extreme claim the wolves are not dangerous and will run away.   Another unsafe wolf encounter.  When will the public be told the truth instead of the Disney G rated version of wolves.  Wolves are dangerous predators.  Habituated wolves are even more dangerous.  

This is the same Luna wolf pack noted for encircling a boy a little less than a year ago.

On Monday night November 5th at 10:00 PM our deer hunting camp on the West Fork of the Gila River, was terrorized by a pack of wolves estimated to be 4 to 6 in number. They came right into our camp howling right between our hunters tent and the cook tent and then just on the other side of the guide’s tent. We had our horses and mules high lined at the camp and when we started hearing the wolves growl right next to the horses, we got up and tried to run them out. We walked down to the end of the highlines, with several thousands of dollars worth of horse and mule fllesh tied up and it probably looked like a smorgage board or shish kabob to the wolves, and it became quiet for a little while. We went back to the tent, and then the wolves moved back in and started howling again.

My son Brian went back down to protect the animals by getting between them and the wolves, and then the wolves really set up a racket of a combination of howling, yap barking, growling and snapping their teeth. They were really intimidated by him being there. It sounded like 4 to 6 wolves and my son held his ground in the pitch black of night and had to stay there for probably 30 minutes before he was satisfied they had maybe left. Needless to say we didn’t get much sleep the rest of the night. Brian said it litterally scared the hell out of him!

Our three hunters from the San Antonio, TX area were really scared, so much so they stayed real quiet through the whole ordeal in fear that the wolves might hear them and come to their tent, which is where the first howls came from. They literally can not believe what the Government is doing to the people here by putting the wolves back. The old timers got rid of them for good reason.
Over the last several years we have had wolves howling out side of our camp but never had them come right through camp and absolutely have no fear of humans or human scent. They acted very aggressive and especially so when my son confronted them the last time. They really became excited. These wolves are absolutely a danger to humans and livestock as they seemed to not even care about human scent like most wild animals.

 

We think Nick Smith used to camp where we were camped, when he was packing elk meat and dog food in a few years ago to feed the wolves. We had heard the wolfer airplane circling in the TurkeyFeather Mountain area earlier that day and the tracks confirmed they had come up out of Cooper Canyon and Iron Creek on the trail and over Turkey Feather Pass and down to the West Fork of the Gila and returned out the same way. There were wolf tracks on the trail for about 5 miles.

When we came out yesterday on Thursday November 8th, we met a group of male back packers who were camped on the confluence of Cooper Canyon and Iron Creek and they related a story to my hunters who were on the back of our packstring, and I didn’t get to talk to, as I had passed by them, or I would have gotten a name and info from them. They said that on Wednesday evening that they were above camp gathering firewood when they noticed movement and the saw the wolves and evidently the wolves made a move toward them and they ran back to camp and one of them climbed up in a tree and waited until the wolves left. They were terrified!

full posting from WolfCrossing.org

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

Absurdity of the Three Strikes Rule for Wolves

Posted in Wolf Warnings, Wolf Politics, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Leave Alone Policy, Management Gone Wild, Property Rights on November 29th, 2007 by Wild

Interesting post from another blog on the 3 Strikes Rule for Wolves.  The author makes a good point about the three strikes rule. 

I wanted to make sure a few points were added to the information and common assumptions about the 3 strikes rule and how things are implemented here in the Southwest.

  • A few things you should know are that to get a strike against a wolf 100% of the evidence must be there not just a overwhelming amount of evidence.  You better document everything including preserving tracks with tarps etc.  Some counties have a wolf investigator.   It is best to call them to do the investigation.
  • The strikes are to go against all wolves in the pack involved but here on the ground it is usually only given to one wolf (usually with the fewest strikes).  Measurements are taken on all the wolf bites so they know which pack members were involved but this does not matter to the welfare US Fish and Wildlife Service as they do their job to protect the wolves reputation and their jobs.
  • Strikes roll off in a year so if US Fish and Wildlife service picks up a wolf and takes them to wolfie spa for a few months to find a mate many of the strikes roll off and they have a free bill to kill again when released.
  • Some three strike wolves that were picked up have been re-released near communities, farms and ranches only to kill again and be legally killed themselves. 
  • If a wolf kills your whole flock of sheep or heard of horses in a 24 hour period regardless of the number of animals killed that is only one strike.
  • Strikes do not count for dogs killed, chickens and other pets.  These are a free kill for the wolves.
  • Human encounters even dangerious ones do not count as a strike
  • The people getting to decide the strikes are also the people running the program.  You and your animals loose. 

Who knows how much the people here in the Southwest have had to pay out to the program in emotional and financial expences.  Do you want to watch your lovely horse get skinned out by strangers all to tell you later oh it must have only been one wolf (when you saw 4 on your horse). How many dead animals do you want to pick up in one day?  How many foals, calves, puppies, and other pets need to be ripped apart before people understand the tragey of this Mexian Gray Wolf program?   Are kids next?

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

More Mountain Lion Attacks in Califorina

Posted in EnvironMental, Apathetic Press (AP), Science Politics, Leave Alone Policy, Management Gone Wild, Property Rights on November 29th, 2007 by Wild

Habituated predators that can kill and prey on humans are not safe.  Today’s story is from Southern California where some dogs were attacked and one killed by a lion in an urban area.  First of all lions are generally scared of dogs and will run from them only attacking dogs if they feel safe.   So I am told by the local hunters here.   I have even seen lions run from jack russels; not that a lion will not get a dog but this is a bold lion indeed.  The issue is this lion has learned to prey in back yards. 

Add to that the dogs were in their own back yard.  Now the environMental do not even feel we can have our pets on our own property or yards as it is the lions right to kill our pets.

What if this had been a child playing in their own back yard?  The environMental does not care about your safety.

Dangerous predators in and around our homes need to be removed.  This is a public safety issue.  From the news reports it sounds like nothing is being done only the stay indoors and be a prisoner in your own home.

 

Mountain Lion Attack in Duarte
LOS ANGELES (KNX 1070 NEWSRADIO)  — Two dogs were attacked by a mountain lion in a Duarte backyard. A German shepherd was killed, and the other dog was injured.

The lion struck before dawn at a house on Cedarwood Avenue at the top of Las Lomas Road, according to Duarte city hall.

Animal Control and the Sheriff’s department were called to the scene.

The state Department of Fish and Game is recommending all pets be put inside at night. They also say children should not be left outside unsupervised in homes located near the foothills.
Orginal Story

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

New Mexico Game and Fish Director Bruce Thompson Adds Poacher to His Resume

Posted in Wolf Politics, Most Popular, Apathetic Press (AP), Management Gone Wild, Property Rights on November 24th, 2007 by Wild

Poaching on private land but claming his GPS gave him faulty information.  Yeah Right.  I wonder if that excuse works for other hunters. 

Oh and that is alleged poacher and Director of New Mexico Game and Fish Bruce Thompson. There is no mention of this investigation on the NM Game and Fish website.

Bruce Thompson Director of NM Game and FishNot to worry he will be investigated by his own employees at New Mexico Game and Fish and no doubt will not suffer any fines for poaching or jail time as happens to the little hunters when they make a mistake. 

I am sure his employees when they clear him of wrong doing in this poaching investigation will no doubt be promoted or be transferred to better locations in New Mexico.  Maybe just a newer tax payer truck was the price tag.   Paybacks for the powerful and another government tax paid official showing his corrupt yellow underbelly.
 

I have to wonder about our governor Bill Richardson (presidential candidate) when his good buddy Bruce does things like this.  No doubt Bill Richardson will also apply pressure to get these charges dropped.
 

Time for a new Director of New Mexico Game and Fish.  There are some good employees out there who would no doubt do a much better job.

Game and Fish director probed for alleged violation of hunting rule
The Current-Argus
Article Launched: 11/22/2007 03:32:54 PM MST
SANTA FE — State Department of Game and Fish conservation officers are looking into whether the department’s director violated a state hunting rule.

Department spokesman Dan Williams said the alleged infraction involving Bruce Thompson happened this past hunting season in southeastern New Mexico. Thompson had a deer hunting permit for public land.

Thompson said he used the wrong GPS coordinate when planning a hunt, which led him on to private land. He said he immediately reported the incident to his staff and is cooperating with investigators.

‘’I made an honest mistake, and this situation concerns me because I pride myself on being a hunter who pays meticulous attention to the rules,'’ he said Wednesday.

Thompson said he doesn’t expect to be treated differently than any other hunter and ‘’will accept any pertinent consequences.'’

No charges have been filed against Thompson.

Orginal Story

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

Red Wolf is Hybrid - Preserving Hybrids with Your Tax Dollars

Posted in Wolf Politics, Logic Fringe, Science Politics, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Animal Stories, Management Gone Wild on November 23rd, 2007 by Wild

Old story but another case of convincing the public to spend their tax dollars protecting hybrid wolves and using the Endangered Species Act to do so.

Wayne listed in the article was also instrumental in the genetics studies on the hybrid Mexican Wolves.  Wayne has a financial stake in protecting these wolves as his salery and contracts are paid by tax dollars to protect wolves….not hybrids but read the story and see how the data and facts are slanted.

 

Conserving a coyote in wolf’s clothing? - whether the red wolf is a separate species or a hybrid not eligible for protection

Science News, June 15, 1991 by Carol Ezzell - Orginal Story

Conservationists who seek to preserve the North American red wolf as a unique species may be barking up the wrong tree. For decades, the red wolf has been nearly indistinguishable genetically from either the gray wolf or the coyote, report two population geneticists who have compared DNA “fingerprints” from captive red wolves with those from frozen blood samples and museum skins.

The finding is expected to fuel the debate over whether the red wolf is a separate species — eligible for conservation under the Endangered Species Actor a hybrid resulting from years of cross-breeding between overlapping populations of gray wolves and coyotes. In general, such hybrids are excluded from protection under the conservation law.

The red wolf became extinct in the wild in 1975, falling prey to systematic hunting and human encroachment into its habitat in the southeastern United States. But just before the last of the red wolves died off, ecologists rounded up several mating pairs and used them to found a captive breeding colony sponsored under the Endangered Species Act. The breeding program has released 25 of its 170 live red wolves into protected areas in North Carolina and on several southeastern coastal islands.

To probe the red wolf’s ancestry, Robert K. Wayne of the University of California, Los Angeles, and Susan M. Jenks of the University of California, San Francisco, analyzed mitochondrial DNA samples from the captive colony. Because DNA in the mitochondria — the cell’s energy-producing organelles — mutates more rapidly than DNA in the nucleus, Wayne and Jenks hoped it would provide a clearer picture of the animal’s heritage.

The researchers chopped up mitochondrial DNA taken from the captive red wolves and sorted the pieces on a gel slab according to their size. The fragments formed a characteristic pattern, or DNA fingerprint, identical to that of coyote mitochondrial DNA.

“We were somewhat disappointed,” says Wayne, now head of conservation biology for the Zoological Society of London. “We were hoping to find a unique red wolf [gene pattern].”

He and Jenks then turned to frozen samples of blood drawn from 32 wild red wolves before the extinction. More than 80 percent of the samples yielded mitochondrial DNA identical to that of coyotes, and the rest proved identical to gray wolves.

Finally, the researchers examined mitochondrial DNA extracted from six pelts collected from red wolves between 1905 and 1930. All the pelts’ DNA fingerprints matched those of either gray wolves or coyotes.

Jenks (now at the University of California, Berkeley) and Wayne report in the June 13 NATURE that their results could support either of two conclusions: that the red wolf is a true hybrid, or that it picked up the genetic similarities sometime in the distant past when its diminishing numbers caused it to mate with gray wolves or coyotes out of desperation.

Either way, Wayne contends that the red wolf should continue to be conserved. “No matter what it was — hybrid or separate species — what is being bred today in the captive colony is representative of what was in the wild,” he argues. “In that sense, we ought to preserve it.”

Doug Inkley, an ecologist with the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C., points out that the red wolf, as a top predator, was important in maintaining the balance of species in the ecosystems in which it lived. The Endangered Species Act specifically provides protection for such key predators, he told SCIENCE NEWS, whether or not they are genetically distinct.

But in an editorial accompanying Wayne and Jenks’ paper, zoologists John L. Gittleman and Stuart L. Pimm of the University of Tennessee in Knoxville suggest the red wolf may be getting more protection than it deserves. The reintroduction program, they contend, is not likely to benefit the red wolf because the animal’s genetic identity will only be obscured once again by mating with coyotes. In addition, they argue that the important ecological role once performed by red wolves is now being filled by other predators. Gittleman and Pimm question whether “the red wolf’s undeniable cuddliness is enough to warrant according it special attention.”

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is taking a wait-and-see attitude. “We’re just getting a few bits and pieces of the puzzle,” says Gary Henry, coordinator of the agency’s red wolf conservation program in Asheville N.C. “There needs to be a lot more work done before we’ll ever finally sort this out.”
COPYRIGHT 1991 Science Service, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

New Mexico has a Superior Resolution to Alaska’s Solution to California’s Beaver Problems – Mexican Gray Wolves

Posted in Wolf Politics, Most Popular, Science Politics, Animal Stories, Management Gone Wild, Wolf Award on November 13th, 2007 by Wild

Release the Mongrel Mexican Gray Wolves

In a recent article by… the author suggests shipping some Alaskan wolves to California to help reduce the beaver problem in Martinez California.

Martinez, Calif., has a wildlife problem: Too many beavers, and nobody wants them killed. Well, almost nobody.
Alaska has a wildlife problem: Too many wolves, and nobody wants them killed. Well, almost nobody.
Is it possible these two problems could be brought together in one easy, perfectly natural solution?
Wolves love beavers.

OK, they don’t actually “love'’ beavers; they love to eat beavers.
And that could be a good thing in this case. Think of it as the perfectly natural way to deal with what the San Francisco Chronicle headlined as the “fate of popular beavers and their damned dam.'’
Bringing the wolves and the beavers together certainly has to beat the alternatives.

“The beaver dam, built right on a recently completed flood improvement project, has grown from three to six feet in height since last winter, putting the town in serious jeopardy of being inundated during winter rains,'’ the Chronicle’s Peter Fimrite reported earlier this month.

For a city to end up flooded by its own flood improvement project would not only be costly, it would be embarrassing. So Martinez has resolved something needs to be done.

“The (city) staff report, made public Friday, says the city should remove the dam and ‘humanely depredate the beavers,’ ‘’ Fimrite wrote. (read the full story)

I must praise this author for not only thinking environmentally but thinking about what is best for California. I grant Craig Medred my Wolf Award for excellence.

The author is right, after all after culling the beavers to only the strong (or that whole population of beavers as happened to snowshoe hair on Ellesmere Island) the wolves will set out on other prey no doubt culling a few radical environmentalists from the human herd. But no doubt the wolves will improve the breed of beavers so only the best live.

This author is on to a great idea that all the Californians that support the wolf program and dysfunctional hybrid Mexican gray wolf program with their donations, get to have a few wolves in their yards too. I think New Mexicans can improve on the Alaskan solution.

Your Alaskan wolves are not ready for the urban environment like our habituated Mexican gray wolves. Why because our half breed cage raised Mexican Mongrel Gray Wolves are much tamer and already have been hanging around human communites into an art form. They are even up on some of their shots…well not rabies but who is counting (those vaccines are bad right?).

So often the Mexican gray wolves even visit our yards leaving our dead and maimed pets or other little presents in our yards. I have heard at the Academy Awards the celebrities love getting gifts. So I am sure they would enjoy the presents that the mongrel Mexican Gray Wolves would leave them.

California celebrities would also be glad to hear about our new thinner elk and how they got there with a type of wasp waist. Might even be the new diet craze called Chronic Wasting Disease which is present now in our elk herds (spred by wolves and other predators) but those poking out hip bones look really sexy.

The habituated Mexican Gray Wolf will no doubt settle into the Martinez and other urban communities of Contra Costa County like they have here in our counties in New Mexico. These wolves are constantly around our homes so no doubt they will be much happier in an urban environment than the northern wolf.

These hybrid wolves also know how to den near homes so California kids will be able to share in the joys of watching the pups grown and slaughter their pets and livestock as is common here in New Mexico. No need to watch the biased wolf documentaries on National Geographic. Reduction of TV time for children another great benefit to these wolves.

Our wolves here are already well acquainted to the use of gunfire, rubber bullets and other hazing techniques so California will no doubt be a safe haven for them. Heck they can just hang out with the gang bangers and do a little tagging like they already do around our homes here. (I could link up the pictures of wolf poop on our porches but I will spare you)

Our wolves here are so tame they are even stalking (oops I mean following) school children home from school. While our Governor (and presidential candidate) Bill Richardson thinks it is wonderful and throws is support to wolf awareness week, I cannot wait to see what they will do in California. Maybe they will create a wolf holiday for the stalking wolf or change their state flag to the wolf.

Here the wolves also have not faired so well having to cross 100s of miles to find communities to use in gathering their food. In California with a much denser population, the mongrel Mexican Gray wolves should have an easier time in finding pets and other food to eat.

I am sure unlike people in New Mexico that understand fully that wolves stalking and encircling children is a prey testing for future attacks, in California they will think the wolves were just curious and wanted to be taken home and cuddled (the wolves were just misunderstood).

One family here has had a pack constantly eating their pets and livestock and has visited them over 27 times in 30 days. No doubt in California they will be charging admission. Then instead of Defenders of Wildlife posters of wolves looking cute on their walls they can see real wolves in action killing their pets. Then we can blame them for letting their pet out for a few seconds to go pee outside instead of on their livingroom rug. Here in New Mexico the blame game is all to popular by goverment officals.

Of course what would California be without lawyer suing when the wolves get aggressive and do what wolves historically do and environmental groups suing to protect the wolves, along with someone else suing to protect the beaver’s property rights to their dam.

With the expansion of the Wolf reintroduction boundaries of the Mexican Gray Wolf program…wolves will soon disperse to California so it is only a matter of time. Lets help them out and send them a few wolves now. I mean no disrespect but I am also not sure your Alaskan wolves can match the spiked up genetics of our Mexican gray wolves.

Donations for private plane transportation now being accepted. After all you cannot expect these expensive ($300,000+ tax dollers per wolf) wolves to fly coach. They must fly Al Gore style.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

Habituated Wolves are Dangerious Wolves

Posted in Wolf Politics, Science Politics, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Leave Alone Policy, Management Gone Wild, Wolf Award on November 9th, 2007 by Wild

Small rural county continues to stand up to the goverment that has dumped habituated wolves on residents.  I am proud of the Catron County Commission and of the people of Catrion County never has a county been so effected by wolves only to have additional cage rased wolves released on them.

Looks like US Fish and Wildlife Service consider wolves hanging around our homes, camps, stalking children, and denning on or near our private property as acceptable.  The are warning signs for future wolf attacks on people.

Read more about habituated wolves and the warning signs for wolves becoming man eaters.

Stalking the Habituated Wolf - Part 1: What is Habituated Wolf Behavior?

Incidents, Examples and Studies: Danger Lurks with Habitual Wolves - Part 2: Stalking the Habitual Wolf

 

CATRON COUNTY COMMISSION
PO BOX 507
RESERVE NM  87830
Ed Wehrheim, Chairman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Contact:  Ed Wehrheim, Catron County Chairman    
Phone 505.533.6423
Email: ccmanager@gilanet.com
 

HABITUATED WOLVES ARE DANGEROUS WOLVES
Catron County Presses FWS on Habituated Wolves

 

RESERVE, N.M.  A recent inquest determined that Kenton Carnegie had been killed by wolves two years ago in Ontario, Canada.  On October 11 of this year, the Catron County Commission sent a letter to Dr. Benjamin Tuggle of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service notifying him of the County’s findings of imminent danger and a demand for permanent removal of a male Mexican wolf from the Durango pack.  The wolf had, at that time, been documented as frequenting two homes, one twenty-one times and another seven times over the course of a few months.
 
In its letter to Dr. Tuggle, the County cited the “10J Rule”, a part of the Endangered Species Act which applies to the experimental, non-essential Mexican wolf population.  This rule provides guidance for management of the Mexican wolf program and definitions of what constitutes a problem wolf.  The County pointed out that the wolf in question met four of the five possible identifiers (only one is required for a wolf to be so identified).  According to the 10J Rule, a problem wolf can be removed from the wild by the wolf program before it performs some action which may require, by the same Rule, that the wolf be destroyed.
 
However, in his October 27 letter of reply, Dr. Tuggle chose to disagree with the County’s findings, stating that the wolf’s actions did not constitute problem behavior, and further stated that the behaviors exhibited by the wolf would be best dealt with via “aversive conditioning methods”, stating that the measures had been proven to be successful.
 
During the ten days that these methods were employed by authorities, the wolf returned to one of the homes five times.
 
“Dr. Tuggle seems to think the wolf’s being documented at homes 28 times is normal wolf behavior,” said Catron County’s Wolf Interaction Investigator, Jess Carey.  “He thinks it is acceptable for a family to have to live with people on their property on a daily basis, hazing the wolves away to protect the family.”
 
According to a recent report by Dr. Valerius Geist, a Canadian biologist, becoming used to and not afraid of humans is one of the final steps before a wolf starts seeing humans as prey.  Dr. Geist consulted wolf experts from around the world and identified seven stages of wolf habituation leading to attacks on humans.
 
“It appears that Dr. Tuggle is content that wolves in Catron County are displaying the exact behavior displayed by wolves that killed and ate Kenton Carnegie,” said Ed Wehrheim, Chairman of the Catron County Commission.  “We have a serious problem of escalating habituated behavior here. We told Dr. Tuggle very clearly of the evidence we have that the wolf is habituated and therefore a problem wolf.  We invited him to come down here and examine our evidence.  Our documentation includes three videos that were taken of wolves in people’s yards, taken from their living room window.  A habituated wolf is a dangerous wolf and we need to get these habituated wolves out of the our county so they are no longer threatening our people.”
 
In a reply letter to Dr. Tuggle from the County, Wehrheim stated “the County has taken no action in order to give you time to do your job.  However, we can wait no longer.” 

Commissioner Wehrheim stated that the County will take measures to protect its citizens, acting under the Catron County Wolf Protection Ordinance. 

“It is the moral and legal responsibility of the Catron County Commission, first and foremost, to  protect the safety, health and welfare of the residents of Catron County,” the letter concludes.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content

Jury Reviews Evidence and Determines Wolf Killed Young Ontario Man

Posted in Wolf Warnings, Most Popular, Science Politics, Leave Alone Policy, Animal Stories, Management Gone Wild on November 1st, 2007 by Wild

The self professed wolf expert, Dr. Paul Paquet, that strung this court along and the Carnegie family along with is incorrect “expert”.  This important public safety information has been delayed for over 2 years due to his lies in trying to rewrite what the evidence and eye witnesses clearly saw.   This was not only a miscarriage of justice to the family but put public safety at risk.


I recommend that all data, science and studies reviewed or authored by Dr. Paul Paquet shall be removed from the records of the wolf program and all his information shall be researched again by an independent source.  If this man cannot properly identify a bear or wolf track or even clearly review a mountain of evidence pointing to wolves, what other misinformation has he perpetuated on the current wolf science?

Jury at inquest to determine whether Ont. man killed by bear or wolf  

PRINCE ALBERT, Sask. — The jury at the inquest into the death of an Ontario man killed by wildlife will start deciding Thursday whether it was a bear or wolf that killed him.

The distinction is important to biology groups, the public and the family of 22-year-old Kenton Carnegie, said his father, Kim Carnegie, of Oshawa, Ont.

“We believe we had an obligation to the public to let them know how Kenton died,” he said after the third day of the inquest wrapped up Wednesday.

“How is Saskatchewan going to develop a wolf-human conflict plan if they believe a bear killed our son?”

Kenton Carnegie’s body was found Nov. 8, 2005, about a half kilometre from Points North Landing, a remote community about 120 kilometres northeast of the Key Lake mine and more than 750 kilometres northeast of Saskatoon.

The co-op student with the University of Waterloo was working with an Ontario geophysics company in northern Saskatchewan when he was killed.

The inquest heard from two experts on the issue of whether it was a bear or wolf that killed the young man.

Dr. Paul Paquet, a self-employed researcher with affiliations to universities across Canada, said it is his opinion that it was a bear that killed Carnegie.

He reviewed evidence, including interviews, autopsy reports and photographs taken at the scene, and wrote a report on his findings.

“The ultimate conclusion was that it was an attack by a large predator. We know that for certain,” he said.

Paquet said the evidence eliminated a grizzly bear or a cougar. He wouldn’t rule out a wolf, but suggested the feeding behaviour was consistent with a black bear.

Although a necropsy performed on two wolves that were killed revealed hair that was likely human in the animals’ colons, a DNA sample could not be gathered to definitively link it to Carnegie.

Paquet cautioned the hair could have been consumed at the dump. “The probability of the attack being that of a wolf is very, very low,” he said. “Documentation in North America is poor. I’m sure wolves have killed people before, we just have no documentation on it.”

Mark McNay, recently retired as head of the research department at the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, argued it was wolves that killed and partially consumed Carnegie.

He said bears most likely would have been in hibernation when Carnegie was killed (Paquet argued that male bears might have been out looking for food).

McNay said the people he interviewed had not seen a bear in the area for several weeks before Carnegie’s death and for months after.

In photographs of the site, what Paquet identified as bear tracks were actually wolf tracks, said McNay. The tracks were on the lake’s surface, which had not completely frozen over. When the wolf stepped into the ground and broke through to water, the water came up and made the track larger, leading people to believe it was bear tracks.

McNay said it was also unlikely that two wolves would have eaten the same hair from the dump on the same day Carnegie was killed.

As for the argument that wolves don’t attack humans, McNay said that is not the case anymore because wolves are becoming habitualized and losing their fear of people.

“These incidents of wolves and people, predictably, are going to increase,” he said.

Orginal Story

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
Sphere: Related Content